- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 7
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
rhainan wrote: Finally, those of you that spend a lot of time downwind seem to be hinting that shorter is the way of the future. Do we need a high performance 18 foot/5.5m meter surf ski?
rhainan wrote: I also can see rotomolded boats jumping up in performance. Perhaps a 20' roto ski would be far too heavy, but a slimmer, high performance V7 would find a home with many of us, I'm sure. Could the rumored V9 be a reality?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
photofr wrote: My vote obviously goes for lighter paddler skis, with an emphasis on:
42-45 cm at the widest point, but with a very narrow catch area.
Widest point behind the seat.
Seating area at least 3 inches above the heels.
Slightly more forward seating area.
Shorter skis (let's get back to under 6m).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.