Smeddles, every thing I write in these forums is straight off the top of my head.
There is no cut and pasting, that's just too time consuming.
Rattling down what falls out of my head takes me no longer to write, than you to read.
I have never said I am a high profile paddler, in fact if you follow this forum regularly you can quite easily track my development from the day I bought my boat.
My credentials come from running/triathlon/cycling/swimming where I had competed and coached at a high level for many years.
All the main stuff is directly transferable to paddling apart from technique and the differing energy requirements of this past time.
Again, if you take the time to research all of my posts from the very beginning, you will also be able to track my own search for what good technique is for me and for others.
You can also track my own search for knowledge into composite construction and how it relates to paddling craft.
The interval speeds are what I see on my Garmin.
There are influences from tidal currents and winds.
But when I do these intervals, those are the numbers I see.
Typically close to 16kmh top speed, note I said top speed, not average, These are momentarily reached speeds, and usually an average of around 13.7 to 13.9, I've seen a couple of 14's and these were certainly tidal assisted.
The speed drops off dramatically towards the end in these 450m as it is a balls out no pacing effort.
Just as I wrote above.
Nothing like the average of 16 that you have mistakenly read into it.
If I go and check carefully the Garmin readouts, the distance will more than likely be not exactly 450m, but close, a few meters either way, just like a few seconds either way over that distance dramatically alters the paper outcome, but for my needs, the length is around that and those are the times I saw just before I broke my boat the first time.
At the moment having been out of the boat for several weeks with a combination of flu, busted finger and again a busted boat, I certainly won't achieve those speeds for another couple of months at least, and won't even try as it is more important for me to just get back in and spend time in the boat and develop my basic aerobic stuff, so when my new boat turns up, you'll see me out doing the long stuff at my own pace for a few weeks before I will start the interval stuff again.
If you took the time to know me, you will find somebody capable of a sub 30min 10km run time and average speeds time trialing on the bike of around 44kmh.
You will then see that I do have the basic pedigree to be fast, although paddling will never reach that level, just as my swimming lagged behind the other disciplines.
You won't hear of me much here either because I only moved here a few years ago and have not coached or competed locally as I was struggling to walk with a foot injury and then two busted discs in my back.
My coached athletes are now scattered around Australia and because my style of coaching is to help the athlete learn for themselves, they are mostly self coached now apart from short calls for advice.
Every session we do is explained and they understand why it is structured that way.
Having this knowledge for themselves helps them to achieve the aims of the session, not merely do as they are told.
It also helps them when racing as they understand what should be avoided and to not get lost in the moment and blow it.
As for the attitude of Tony H that if you don't race you can't know anything or even be taken seriously, tell that to the hundreds of paddlers around here that what they do is not serious.
Just because they have kids to look after, small businesses to run and cannot get away to compete, doesn't mean that can't paddle or that they are not keen as mustard every time they get in the boat.
For my own racing asperations, again if you go back through my posts, you will find that until feb/march last year, my back injury was pretty much hit or miss each day whether or not I would be able to paddle, so it made no sense to me to sign up for a race that I probably couldn't do anyways, and if I did, I would be entering carrying an injury that may compromise my safety.
Hardly a good thing to load off onto the organisers.
When I finally did beat my back problem, and my speed started to get up there, I broke my boat.
This took ages to fix and I didn't buy a new boat at that stage as I found out most of the way through my search and demoing new boats, that a 5 old year court case would at last happen and after that I would be able get any boat I wanted without compromise.
This court case also took up a lot of time as well as me starting to finally work again, I didn't get in a boat for ages.
Again, not ideal conditions to go out and start racing.
Since xmas I have been struggling with a long term hand/finger injury from rock climbing that was being aggravated by paddling, so something had to give, and paddling is what gave.
I am now happily finding my old athletic self on the bike while my hand/finger heals and will be back in the boat soon when my new boat turns up.
At this stage, my goal is to finally compete in one of the local races in the last quarter of the year, I noticed a longer one just on my doorstep and this is a long enough time frame that I should have returned to where I was before my boat broke, hopefully better and in a faster craft:)
Now the top speed thing.
Carefully read my posts again.
I said that before I posted then, I wouldn't have believed it myself.
So you can see that I was already skeptical.
The info suggested that it may be true and if you understand the wave period/speed relationship, it is certainly possible.
I have come in on big days in front of Palmy in the high twenties in rough water and the day I posted that figure, the boat certainly felt to going much faster due to the way it skipped along and the way it accelerated.
Sure GPS make errors, all the bloody time and you can often spot them.
Sometimes there are errors but look like they are right and we don't even look twice.
Years ago I was entered in a car rally.
My navigator was a no show, so I headed off by myself with the map and instructions taped to my dash.
I got lost, it was bound to happen, but the way it happened is worth discussing.
I made a mistake, but the next four instructions involving distances and directions all clicked with the roads I was presented with.
It appeared to me that I was fine, but in reality, I had been off course for over 10 KM, it just happened that the instructions still worked in my new erroneous travels.
This eventually lead me to a small stream that looked uncrossable, but seeing as the recent instructions all seemed to add up, I tried to cross, fell into a big hole under the water, bottomed out the car and had the front in deep enough that the electrics went under and my car stopped and the dash lights slowly dimmed and went out.
The only power I had was to the starter, but it wouldn't start.
Frucked up really. But it gives me a great story to tell.
Now in my posts, I never categorically said, 'I went that fast', I said I may have, and outlined the reasons for the possibility of my considering it might be true.
Forum goes nuts, my computer goes bunk, I read on the iphone but don't post and the rest of the forum world created it's own opinion of reality.
That's what happens on forums, by the time I'm back on air, I'm over it, there are other things to keep my mind busy.
People that didn't read and comprehend properly, just like you have read that I claim 16kmh average when I didn't, then form whatever opinion they like to satisfy their own needs.
I don't care, it may be true, it may be a GPS blip that lines up just like my rally instructions, but If it happens again, in a more concrete way, I will not be surprised.
In the end, my coaching knowledge is solid or the info itself would have been shot down in flames long ago and not my person attacked.
My ability to analyse and hypothesise is well proven on this forum, and again when it come to paddling technique, none of my observations have been shot down in flames and I think that most people here on the forum opened their minds a little because of them.
So be careful reading my posts.
I'm like one of those wonderful adds on TV.
There is a lot of sublety in what I write in that I hardly ever say something catagorically, I will often say 'maybe' or 'maybe this happened' or maybe this is the reason' or 'what if'.
These are qualifiers and an indication to take what is written as maybe conjecture, wandering thoughts or things to follow up because I find the curious.
When I say say something I personally believe but may not neccessarily be known or believed by mainstream or if I am just theorising, I will usually preface the comment with 'I have found' or 'I believe'.
This is a hint that maybe I have no clue, but have found an effect and I am searching for others who may have found the same to further my ponderings.
You will not see me add any qualifiers when I am discussing something that I truely know.
Now what I will do, is thank you for your last post.
It was not a stupid flaming personal attack.
It clearly laid out what you believed, and what you thought was a problem and immediately opens channels for mature communications.
Unlike some of the other closed minded personal abuse posts that I am left with no reason not to continue the shits and giggles for the other forum posters and hit back with something similar.
Happy paddling.
Follow the path of the independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the dangers of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of 'crackpot' than the stigma of conformity. And on issues that are important to you, stand up and be counted at any cost.--- Thomas J. Watson