I recently tried a surfski for the first time, it felt very different than my kayak.
In the kayak I had better leg drive, better contact with the boat, and thus more stability and power (in a faster hull).
This is my surfski experience: The bucket was about 1.5 inches wider than my hips, the hard wet surface was very slippery, and the bottom was "flat" (not contoured to the shape of a human behind). This meant that every time a wave hit, the ski shifted under me. Often I ended up sitting on one side of the bucket, with the ski lurched over on that side. Furthermore, the hump touched my calves and prevented any leg drive (I'm 5' 11'). (Shortening the foot plate would have caused me to dorsiflex my feat to 60 degrees.)
I never felt like I was going to capsize. (The hull was slower than my kayak hull.) But I did not feel "one with the boat".
Granted, this particular ski did not fit me. But It made me wonder about ski buckets in general. Do they inherently sacrifice power and/or boat contact for "remountability"?
Are there other advantages to a ski cockpit over a kayak?
It seems like there may be a few dilemmas:
Surfski:
Pad the bucket with foam (locking hips in) to get good boat contact -> reduce/eliminate hip rotation.
Leave a little room for hips to rotate -> reduce boat contact: ski slips around underneath you
Lower hump -> increase leg drive, reduce boat contact even further.
Raise hump -> improve boat contact (but not in an optimal location) reduce or eliminate leg drive.
Kayak:
Hips don't need to touch the sides at all, allowing uninhibited rotation. The contoured seat prevents sideways slipping.
No hump -> maximum leg drive
When needed, the knees can be locked under the deck, increasing stability by making the paddler "one with the boat".
I must be missing some things here, please help me see the light. hehe