Thanks for the responses. I knew full well that some people would take exception to my sweeping generalizations, so that comes as no surprise. Sometimes a forum post has to be a little bit reactionary to elicit any clever responses at all.
Full disclosure, I have never done Molokai or for that matter any open ocean crossing of more than about 10k, and I do have massive respect for anyone who puts themselves out there in exposed conditions. Oscar is a legend and is the best downwind racer of all time, no question. I'm not trying to disparage his character or accomplishments. He and Dean and others have carried the torch since Ocean Racing was in it's infancy and they should be applauded for that.
I'm making the case that, since the explosion of surfski popularity worldwide, there are as many or more paddlers that come from different backgrounds other than the trad. SAF and Aussie and Hawaiian lifeguard/ocean culture and have different priorities in the ski. Maybe it's because they don't have ready access to the kinds of conditions that would allow them to hone downwind skills in large, long-interval swell; or, maybe they transitioned from other avenues of paddling altogether into the ski for various reasons. Or maybe they are just a punter who enjoys the challenge of keeping the thing upright. I was trying to tease out the fact that there is a growing disconnect between these two groups, those for whom ski racing is inextricably associated with big downwinders, and the "silent majority" for whom the ski represents another vehicle for a wide variety of purposes. I suppose I made an unfair judgement towards the former, because they represent surfski racing in its most glamorous iteration, and are more aligned with the spirit of ski racing since it's inception. It is also fair to suggest that if I lived in Maui or Cape Town I would enjoy the thrill of TRUE downwind racing, and have no use for paddling in anything else. I also am aware that this is a South Africa based forum so it obviously reflects the interests of those lucky enough to avail themselves of these conditions, no surprise there. (BTW) if anyone wants to buy me a plane ticket to these aforementioned downwind Meccas I will gladly accept the challenge of giving it a shot in the monster stuff. In this case my comments stemmed from a bit of jealousy, in the same way that I am jealous of snowskiers who live in Utah.
I did take exception to the lack of props given to Clint after his third victory, as he is sort of a hero of mine since I followed him in the K1. It seemed that the unspoken implication was that is the conditions weren't bonzer then it was somehow less of a victory.
And I do stand by my comments that there are people who 2 types of folks who enjoy ski racing: Surfski people first and foremost, who could just as easily do some other extreme ocean sport like kitesurfing in lieu of adrenaline-fueled downwind racing, and then there are "Paddlers" who happen to paddle a surfski, for whom paddling is the lifelong avocation and the ski is one more discipline to try to master. I guess my prejudices here are obvious but they are not gospel and are just the ruminations of a guy on a forum. I wondered, out of curiosity, who considered themselves to be which, and why?
I consider myself an expert paddler, but certainly not an expert ocean racer by any stretch of the imagination. But when did it become necessary to be at the top of the heap to have an opinion? I can tell you a few things about Mars, but I've never been there either.
Moreover the commentary here has made me change my opinion about Molokai in particular. It makes sense to me now that at least one of the big races should be a proper downwinder, if only to preserve the link between today and the origin of the sport. And I read the post about Hank McGregor saying the flight to Hawaii was like 30hrs. If I had suffered through that then I would want to race in fun conditions as well as a reward for my troubles.