Been thinking alot about leg drive in the ski vs. kayak, how they differ, and why I have never fallen head over heels for any ski I've ever tried. First off, I realize that the ski is the right tool for the job if that job is chasing runs downwind, and that pedal steering is a necessity for these conditions. That said, I cannot generate half as much leg drive with a setup that requires you drive primarily with your heels, as I can in any kayak with a fixed footboard, footstrap, knees in center position that allows me to really drive hard with my forefoot. I think this is why ski's are a joke for flatwater inland racing, and are purpose specific ocean downwinder machines. Look at the footage from the steelcase run. The top guys are barely generating any leg drive at all, and I don't believe it's from lack of trying. The leg hump and pedal steering simply don't accomodate this drive. Contrast this with World Class guys in the K1 and you will see a huge difference. In the Barton Mold, Greg himself talks about pushing primarily with his forefeet, although he does a bit thru the heels as well. I have a decked boat that is 20'x17' and is essentially an elite surfski hull with no rudder at all and fixed footplate, and I can paddle it markedly faster than a similar hull with standard ski outfitting (i'm not even exaggerating)
Of course with no rudder it's useless for downwinders, but much more rewarding to race around the harbor in, as I can steer it well enough for this purpose just by heeling the boat. I think all claims about elite skis being as fast as a K1 are only true in the abstract from a hull design standpoint but this is a canard as one can't apply near as much power in the ski. why does this matter?
First off realize that if you are only pushing with your heels you are severely limiting your leg drive output. Why do cyclists and rowers push with their forefoot, because it's what works.
Since elite skis seem to be built for antipodean giants, a guy with a size 8.5 shoe can't even get enough of his forefoot over the board to drive with the ball of the foot and steer only with toes only, which is how it ought to be done. If I drive with my upper foot there is no way not to perturb the ski with constant yawing from minute pedal input. I would love to try a low hump, high seat ski like a nelo with a tiller bar rudder control and fixed board like a K1, FOR THE CONDITIONS I PADDLE IN, this would be the best compromise. In open ocean, I guess ability to steer acutely on the fly outweighs all of these considerations, and it's a fair trade off, horses for courses. But in a race that's a grind with precious little swell it's literally painful to watch elite paddlers be so inefficient owing entirely to their equipment To the extent you can figure out a means to incorporate more forefoot drive in the ski you will always be faster. I think the ideal outfitting for the ski has yet to be determined. Incidentally, I think the tendency for the ski to yaw under power
is not really avoidable, except by running a huge rudder that introduces too much drag. In my experience it is largely a function of rocker. Hull design is still largely based on Hydrostatics, and there is little to no data about how hulls react differently to heave, pitch, and yaw moments generated by the oscillating, reciprocal nature of the kayak stroke. This is where improvements in hull design ultimately lie.