I genuinely hope that no one takes the following comments as being smug or combative, I really don't mean them that way. I am typing it all with a smile and a playful chuckle and in no way do I wish to, or mean to, offend anyone's opinions, knowledge, experience or expertise.
I am just confused by what appears to be an obsessive need for everything on a boat to be it's absolute lightest and hydro dynamically efficient at the cost of all else; basically, meaning comfort, practicality and possibly even stability.
I guess that because I am looking at things from a non-racing perspective when it comes to paddling that I often don't understand why so much time and effort, is often devoted to topics about possibly making a boat a tenth of a kilogram lighter or doing things hydro-dynamically that "may" increase a boats speed by .001 kph.
I mean...
Unless every paddler competing is of the exact same weight and stature, the exact same strength and experience, and makes the exact same amount of correct paddling decisions and strokes along the way, I can't for the life of me understand how a .085 kg (3 ounce) lighter rudder, or more hydrodynamic bullet makes any difference whatsoever in the greater scope of things.
I wish I could see something that supports the opinion that during every race run, a more hydrodynamic bullet combined with the boat being a tenth of a kilogram lighter than all of the other boats, always wins. I can't understand how for 99.99% of us, it all makes a squat of difference.
A large surface area, lighter weight, highly buoyant rudder that is always wanting to make it's way to the surface because of it's buoyant nature, as opposed to a heavier, none buoyant rudder, that would probably give better tracking possibly improving stability, somehow doesn't matter and has never even been talked about.
What's next, sailboat keels made of lightweight and highly buoyant materials...( Okay that comment was a bit smug, I admit it! Feel free to throw spoiled fruit in my direction.
)
For some reason, the negligible gains from adding a bullet to the back of a venturi seem to be highly significant when it comes to improving a boats overall hydro-dynamics and speed. I say so because it is very often discussed a few times each and every season.
The truth is, I have never actually read anything, or had an experience that actually proves that a bullet's increase in performance actually really matters enough to make a difference in the grand scope of things.
As far as a boat being a few percentages of a kg lighter...
Truth be told, If I want my boat to be a kilogram or two lighter and faster, it seems far easier to drink a few less beers and eat a few less pizzas than to rely on bullets and buoyant rudders. ( smug again... Start throwing more fruit!
)
Ahhhhhhhhh who am I kidding, I love pizza and beer far too much.
Buoyant rudder's and bullets it is!
I do wonder though, would the lowered center of gravity from a non buoyant, heavy, solid stainless steel rudder improve a boats overall stability enough in certain conditions to actually make a boat faster for some paddlers?
After all, the new catch phrase that seems to be stated everywhere is that, "The fastest boat is the one you are the most stable in."
A final note:(Stop cheering!) My apologies for my shameless, classless and unwarranted hijacking of this thread.
In my defense I have to say that my holiday weekend beer is still very, very, cold, and it's still pretty damn hot out!